It’s elusive, but it’s out there

Some of us use the word “truth” loosely. We use it to describe our political or religious beliefs. Some of those things might be true, but many are not.

So, to ask the question Pontius Pilate asked (he did so sarcastically): “What is truth?”

The best definition I’ve heard is this:

Truth is something that is true for all people in all cultures and nations for all time – past, present and future.

Diversity the key

A good friend in Saginaw, Mich., once explained it like this. She graduated from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, an upscale city of very smart people. Her (at the time) 100-year-old grandmother was born and raised in rural Oklahoma, and had lived in or near her homestead her entire life. And then there’s a starving child in Africa.

If something is true for all three of those people, my friend said, then it’s probably true.

Let’s start with something very basic. Every human needs oxygen to breathe. Rich or poor, black or white, American or Russian, we all require oxygen to stay alive. That is truth.

But wait. We have never seen oxygen. How do we know it exists?

Scientists have told us so. We know all about wind and air – we feel them all the time, even though we can’t see them.

That means the truth about oxygen requires faith – which is defined as believing in something you (or I) cannot see.

Science and faith are integral parts of each other, then.

Science and faith also are integral parts of truth. By definition.

We need sleep, some of us more than others, but we all need it. All of us will die one day. There’s no escaping that. These also are truths that every man, woman and child who ever lived can bank on.

Finding justice

Truth often is hard to find. We have an entire justice system designed to pursue truth. Sometimes they find it, sometimes they don’t, and I suspect most of the time our justice system finds partial truth but not the whole truth, and that’s why we appeal and overturn. We frequently settle before the trial begins because we don’t want to face the truth or go through the effort to seek it out.

Truth is elusive.

Truth about crimes is very real, even if we don’t do a very good job of judging it.

Science and faith, then, are better arbiters of truth than we are. We humans see “truth” through our prejudices, experiences and culture.

The starving child in Africa might see “truth” through very different eyes than you or I do. That child’s prejudices, experiences and culture are not the same as yours and mine are, but are just as real.

Science, faith and truth

On another level, Jesus himself said this: “I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the father except through me (John 14:6).”

Okay. What do we do with that?

Using the logic I have proposed here, scientifically Jesus lived and breathed as a human being about 2,000 years ago. Secular historians agree with this.

Jesus was crucified. This is historical fact, as well. In his Easter sermon, my pastor made the point that the Roman soldiers were professional killers – and were very good at it. There’s no doubt that Jesus died.

The empty tomb also is historical fact. Jesus’ dead body was never found. Indeed, his very-much-alive body was seen by hundreds of people after he was resurrected.

Of course, all of us reading this post have never seen Jesus’ physical body. This is where faith comes in.

So, Jesus called himself “truth.” Either we agree with that, or we don’t. But our thoughts and feelings don’t determine truth.

Using my definition of truth, what Jesus said means that all people – in all nations, cultures and time periods – must find the living God only through himself.

Through no one else.

That’s what Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection were all about. Jesus reconnected us with the living God, because that connection was lost several thousand years previously in the Garden of Eden.

The things Jesus said and did were written down by eyewitnesses. If you read the Bible (Old Testament as well as New Testament, by the way), it’s not an emotional sound track of thoughts and prayers. Poetry is included, as are emotions, but historical details are written matter-of-factly, as a good journalist would write them. They included personal observations and interviews with other eyewitnesses.

Jesus’ death and resurrection were written as historical facts, not as emotional persuasion. We get the details, and add our own feelings to them.

This is why worship styles, to use one example, are a cultural preference, not truth. Drums and guitars, organ and hymnals, an African drum, a cappella, orchestral music, hands raised, knees bowed, dancing or sitting – as long as it worships the living God, he will accept it. I’m convinced of this.

The fact that churches have split over such minor issues as this takes away from God’s glory. It also proves our sinfulness as men, women and children, and our need for God’s forgiveness.

Science, faith and truth are three parts of the same coin. Hmm, coins are two-sided. Let’s see. Science on one side, faith on the other. Truth is both sides put together. Yes, that works.

Oxygen proves that. Our justice system proves that truth often is hard to find – truth is out there, and we are doing our best to discover it. Jesus proves it, too.

It’s universal

Let’s be careful what we call “truth.” If it’s true for you but not for me, it’s not “truth.” Not the way Jesus used the term.

There’s no such thing as “my truth.” If my beliefs and your beliefs differ and we both say our values are true, then both of us can’t be right. Most likely, both of us have partial truth, but not the whole truth. Chaos reigns.

Which is why truth matters.

It’s out there, if we’re willing to look for it. On many levels.

We haven’t changed

I saw this meme the other day on a faith-based site. It’s theologically false. I’ll prove it.

Morals have changed

Morality refers to the distinction between right and wrong, between good and bad behavior.

I’m reading through 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles in a group Bible study. The study is called “The Divided Kingdom.” The division refers to Israel and Judah, because after David and Solomon, those regions split under Solomon’s son Rehoboam and Jeroboam.

The stories of 1 and 2 Kings and 1 and 2 Chronicles is the story of the successive kings of Israel and Judah. Israel did not have even one “good” king during this entire 400-year period. Judah had several kings “who did right in the sight of the Lord.”

Most kings, however, “did what was evil in the sight of the Lord.” They worshiped multiple gods, dealt with mediums and wizards, ignored or desecrated houses of worship, committed fornication and other sexual sins, were violent with each other and with neighboring nations, and ignored the Scriptures completely.

Technology has changed since then, but our morality hasn’t. Like the Israelites 3,000 years ago, we have our moral ups and downs, but mostly down.

Churches have changed

Several New Testament authors wrote letters to newly formed churches about false teachings that were infiltrating their congregations. These writings included Galatians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, James, 2 Peter, and 1 and 2 John.

Martin Luther in 1517 wrote his “95 Theses,” which promoted two central beliefs: that the Bible is the central religious authority, and that humans may reach salvation only by their faith and not by their deeds. Although these ideas had been advanced before, Martin Luther codified them at a moment in history ripe for religious reformation. The Catholic Church has been divided ever since, and the Protestantism that soon emerged was shaped by Luther’s ideas.

With the recent United Methodist Church split over LBGT rights, most major mainline denominations in the United States have now divided over that particular issue – even though the Bible offers clear counsel on that subject.

False teachings have tempted churches, their leaders and their members since the church age began soon after Jesus’ resurrection. They still do.

Societies have changed

The citizens of a city called Babel became very proud about 4,200 years ago. They decided to build a huge tower “so that we may make a name for ourselves.” They decided they didn’t need God; they thought that they were capable of thriving on Earth on their own.

God, therefore, confused their language and scattered them across the Earth.

As in the “morals have changed” section, Israel and Judah frequently tried to thrive without God. Whenever they turned away from God, it didn’t end well.

Much later, even Jerusalem, God’s capital on Earth, rejected Jesus Himself.

Today, we like to say “God bless America,” but fewer than 50 percent of U.S. residents are church members now. And church membership does not always indicate strong faith, either.

We still prefer to be our own gods, to form our own truth. We may not say so in those words, but that’s the way we act.

People have changed

Adam and Eve were the first sinners. They let the serpent deceive them into thinking that God didn’t really care about them. God gave them everything they needed in the Garden of Eden – they knew only good. Until Satan, disguised as a serpent, deceived them.

They fell. As has every human who has ever lived since then. And as do we.

We remain sinners in need of a savior. That hasn’t changed, and never will.

But God’s Word remains the same!

God does not change. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever.

If anyone adds or takes away any words from this scroll, God will take away that person’s share in the tree of life.

This saying is the only one in the meme that is true.

The bottom line

What does it all mean?

  • “No one is righteous; no, not one.” This is stated clearly in Psalms 14:1 and Romans 3:10 – in both the Old and New Testaments.
  • “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun” (Ecclesiastes 1:9).

The big picture of life remains the same across generations. We learn, we grow, we rejoice, we suffer, we teach, we study, we observe, we experience, we hurt, we celebrate, we live, we die.

As individuals, life changes, certainly. I’ve lived in several states, been hired and fired, attended weddings and funerals, thanked God for some things and asked God “Why?” about others.

But nothing I’ve experienced is unique. Nothing at all. You and others like you have done everything I’ve ever done, thought the same thoughts I’ve thought, been the places I’ve been, and worried over the same things I’ve worried over.

This comforts me. It’s easy for me to think I’m an island, that no one understands me. And many of you don’t. I’m a passionate Christian and a passionate journalist at the same time. Very few of you are able to connect those dots the way I can.

But the living God wired me this way, just as He wired you a certain way. Unique, and yet not.

Solomon truly was wise when he wrote, “there is nothing new under the sun.” Technology changes, of course, but people don’t.

Many of us reject God’s boundaries, and so we suffer when we bump up against the world’s more painful limitations. If every single driver followed every traffic law every time, there would never be a collision. Ever think about that?

We run the red light because we are selfish. We don’t want to stop, and we have our reasons. I’ve done it.

But there are consequences, aren’t there? Many times we get away with it. Except when we don’t. The crash. The ticket. The honk from an angry driver we cut off. The frustration in my own heart when that light turns red.

No one is righteous.

Our morals are compromised. We change our churches to fit our values. Our society changes its laws to fit its morals, not the other way around. We put self above others.

As our forefathers did.

God’s message is timeless. We need Him. We always have, and always will.

History teaches future lessons

Asa got off to a great start as king of Judah in Israel’s Old Testament days.

Earlier, Solomon had built an amazing, awe-inspiring temple to Israel’s God, but after he died, the kingdom split apart – Israel to the north, Judah to the south. Israel had no “good” kings who followed the living God. Judah did have some, but Asa’s father and grandfather were not among them.

For though it was just 20 years after the death of Solomon that Asa began to reign, yet very gross corruption had spread far and taken deep root.

Respect for leaders (or not)

The United States, while not specifically set apart and chosen by God the way Israel was, split apart from England in the 1700s. The U.S. has had presidents, not kings, most of whom have done good things for this country over the years.

The kings of Israel had more influence over their people than U.S. presidents do. The point of the U.S. system of government is to share power – among the executive, legislative and judicial branches, and between political parties (including independents and third parties at local levels).

The comparisons, therefore, aren’t perfect.

The people of Judah, for the most part, followed the words and example of their king, good or evil. We in the United States used to do that, electing new presidents every four (or eight) years if we didn’t agree with the direction he was taking our country.

Today, we don’t wait for the next election cycle to voice our opposition to our leaders. We certainly have the right to peacefully protest, but we’ve gone beyond that today to dis-respecting leaders we don’t agree with.

Such opposition proved deadly in ancient times; kings killed even their own family members if they felt competition from them.

Active peace

Asa, who became king of Judah in 910 BC and reigned for 41 years (1 Kings 15:10), did what was good and right in the sight of the Lord his God (2 Chronicles 14:2). He followed two evil kings – his father, Abijah, who ruled only three years, and his grandfather, Rehoboam, who was king when the kingdom of Israel was divided.

Asa took away the foreign altars and the high places, broke down the pillars, hewed down the sacred poles, and commanded Judah to seek the Lord, the God of their ancestors, and to keep the law and the commandment. He also removed from all the cities of Judah the high places and the incense altars. And the kingdom had rest under him.

2 Chronicles 14:3-5

While he had peace, Asa built fortified cities, preparing for future attack while he prospered. He didn’t get lazy and revel in his wealth, as some kings did, but strengthened the nation spiritually and militarily.

Asa also welcomed immigrants (from Israel and other tribes that had broken away) into his nation.

His line in the sand was this: Follow the living God, or die.

Residents and aliens faced the same law. God had blessed the nation, at this time and in many previous generations; Asa knew this, so he sought God’s protection and demanded the people’s obedience.

He gathered all Judah and Benjamin, and those from Ephraim, Manasseh and Simeon who were residing as aliens with them, for great numbers had deserted to him from Israel when they saw that the Lord his God was with him. … They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their ancestors, with all their heart and with all their soul. Whoever would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, should be put to death, whether young or old, man or woman. … for they had sworn with all their heart, and had sought him with their whole desire, and he was found by them, and the Lord gave them rest all around.

2 Chronicles 15:9-15

Asa had an army of 300,000 from Judah who carried shields and spears, and from Benjamin 280,000 men who carried shields and drew bows; all these were mighty men of valor.

Are we ready for battle?

It’s a good thing he prepared his army for future attack, because one came sooner rather than later. Ethiopia “came out against them” with an army of 1 million men.

Asa cried to the Lord his God, “O Lord, there is no difference for you between helping the mighty and the weak. Help us, O Lord our God, for we rely on you.”

2 Chronicles 14:11

God defeated the Ethiopians.

Are we in the United States prepared to face an enemy attack?

We are militarily, but I’m not convinced we are spiritually.

We have turned COVID into a spiritual battle, even though we never should have done that. COVID is a virus, not a demon.

But COVID may have an unexpected effect on Christianity in America. As my pastor frequently bemoans, COVID has isolated us. Many Christians continue to stay home and watch Sunday services online – missing out on the blessings of fellowship and communion.

But is this nothing more than separating true believers from “social belongers,” in the words of one blogger?

Now that nonreligion, or even atheism, is more acceptable in America, social pressures against non-belief and non-attendance are relaxing. Thus, the actively religious will shrink to a core of true believers rather than those who belong without believing. As this process continues, it may become more difficult to recruit new switchers as the rump becomes increasingly composed of believers rather than social belongers. 

Eric Kaufmann
Institute for Family Studies blog

Perhaps it’s too early to make that case with Christians who continue to stay home because of COVID, since the pandemic isn’t over yet. But two years of staying home can change a lifestyle.

Meanwhile, Asa served God faithfully for most of his reign, but he did not finish well.

In the 36th year of his reign, Asa bought an alliance with the king of Aram in a dispute with Israel, instead of trusting God to work things out. In the short run, the alliance worked, since Judah/Aram defeated Israel in battle.

Blaming the messenger

But a seer named Hanani called out King Asa for that, saying, “You have done foolishly in this; for from now on you will have wars” (2 Chronicles 16:9).

Asa got angry with the seer and punished the messenger for his message, putting him in prison. As a result, Asa got a disease in his feet, which afflicted him until he died.

In the thirty-ninth year of his reign Asa was diseased in his feet, and his disease became severe. Yet even in his disease he did not seek the Lord, but sought help from physicians.

2 Chronicles 16:12

We in the United States also frequently shoot the messenger – which, in our country, is the “media.” That’s all media is (are): reporters of information. We oppose certain information, so we blame the media that report it.

In Asa’s day, God was God and truth was truth. Asa didn’t like the critique he heard, so he blamed the messenger. But the message was true nonetheless.

Truth often doesn’t matter today, either. If the message doesn’t fit our narrative – whether it’s true or not – we blame the messenger.

Finishing well is hard

The life of King Asa is an example to us of how easy it is to drift away from the Lord. Asa began his reign with a strong commitment to God, but as years went by his dedication faltered, bringing unnecessary trouble.

I fear the United States is headed down the same path. We already are facing unnecessary suffering and death because we’ve drifted from truth. Our nation has turned away from God, in more ways than we realize.

Will a “king” like Asa or a prophet like Isaiah (or Hanani) come along soon to correct us? Will we listen if he/she does?

Or, like Israel did so many times, will we have to suffer the consequences of rejecting truth?

Republicans have gone AWOL, and this country needs them back

Republicans, where have you gone? This country needs you, but you’ve sold your soul to something else. You’ve lost your way, and not just at the national level.

Locally

In Lorain County, west of Cleveland, where I live, Republicans earned a majority on the county board last November for the first time in decades. The two new GOP members on the three-member board, David Moore and Michelle Hung, made their presence felt almost immediately.

Earlier in 2020, the county board – then comprised of three Democrats – reappointed a Lorain County Community College board member, who had served in that position since 2010. The new board, however, before that board member’s term officially began in January 2021, overturned the reappointment and replaced him with a Republican.

There were no controversies with the longstanding board member, no reason at all for the change – except for the “D” and “R” before the board members’ names.

Michelle Hung

Next, the county board fired the 911 director, as well as the Job and Family Services director. They didn’t say why right away, but the reason became clear soon enough: Hung, a new GOP county commissioner, was having an affair with the 911 director.

While the 911 director lost his job, Hung did not. She refused to resign and still continues to serve.

Another move early in their term: The new county board eliminated the Lorain County Race and Equity Alliance, which was formed in November 2020 “to identify and address policies, practices and power structures that intentionally or unintentionally create inequities and help create a system that works for all residents,” according to a commission resolution.

David Moore

Hung and Moore apparently didn’t see racial inequities that the previous Democratic-led board saw. After the George Floyd killing in May of last year by a white police officer in Minneapolis, awareness of racial issues became mainstream. The new county board apparently didn’t care.

They did a few other controversial things too, then complained when they received pushback from the public. They have turned county government into a circus.

Statewide

On the statewide level, Republican opposition led Dr. Amy Acton (see the main photo) to resign as Ohio medical director in June 2020. She and our governor, Republican Mike DeWine, held daily press briefings in spring 2020 to update Ohioans on statewide response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acton offered charts, graphics, research and pleas to wear masks and social distance (vaccines were still being developed at that point).

Republicans wanted none of this. All they saw was the income lost by business during the lockdown imposed by DeWine at the time.

Yes, businesses suffered, especially small businesses. But there’s a balance. We were – and still are, actually – in a pandemic. Millions were (and are) getting sick, and hundreds of thousands were dying. Masks and distancing were a stopgap measure until vaccines could be developed and approved. Acton knew this and told us this, literally every day.

Until she resigned under pressure from Republicans, who rejected the advice and leadership from their own governor.

Nationally

Unvaccinated Republicans are blamed for a major increase in violence against nurses and doctors in hospitals and other health care settings.

Jim Jordan

My U.S. representative, Republican Jim Jordan, remains clueless on the impact of COVID. He also was, and still is, a huge supporter of former president Donald Trump.

Where to start with Trump?

He also was clueless on COVID-19, which led to untold numbers of unnecessary sicknesses and deaths, until he got the disease himself. He later received a vaccine and encouraged his followers to get one as well.

Trump did not support African-Americans in several high-profile situations, including the wrongful conviction of the Central Park Five in 1989, and he repeatedly criticized NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick for kneeling during the National Anthem. He softened his approach when Floyd was killed, because that happened during an election year.

Donald Trump

Trump courted white evangelical leaders, and many white evangelical Christians supported Trump, while non-white Christians often did not.

Russell Moore, a theologian who also is the president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), blamed Trump for the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Time magazine added this: In criticizing then-President Trump, Moore has diverged from such influential evangelicals as Franklin Graham, who compared Republicans who voted for Trump’s second impeachment to Judas Iscariot; Jerry Falwell Jr., who said he’d give Trump a third honorary degree if he were still head of Liberty University; and author Eric Metaxas, who devoted almost his entire Twitter feed after the election to increasingly bizarre and implausible conspiracy theories on the method by which it was stolen. Moore’s position differs even from that of the guy tipped to be the next head of the SBC, the Rev. Albert Mohler, who voted for Trump in 2020 and said – even after the events at the Capitol – that he’d do it again.

Trump has lived his entire life in controversy. He prefers glitz, from his business dealings to his three wives to his ownership of the Miss Universe pageant to his TV show The Apprentice to his ascent to the presidency. He can’t let all that go, even today. He has to be the center of attention.

The sooner the Republican Party divests itself of Trump, the better off the nation will be.

Getting along

If my blog has one over-arching theme, it’s that we as people should learn how to get along with each other, even if we disagree on issues, lifestyles or politics.

Trump supporters storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 goes against everything I stand for. It hurt personally when some of the people who did that said they did so in the name of Jesus. Those people have no idea who Jesus is or what He is about. Even a cursory reading of the Gospels, where we learn about the life of Jesus on Earth, will prove that.

One of my Republican friends – who I met at church – in the weeks before Joe Biden was officially installed as president claimed that Trump would continue as president. Just wait, he said, and watch.

Well, I did.  So did the nation.

We were shocked.

Defying the U.S. Constitution and the duly elected laws of this country is how Trump was to continue leading us. When George Washington peacefully ceded power over leadership of this nation to John Adams in 1797, history was made – history that was unprecedented. The United States is nothing without the peaceful transfer of power every four or eight years.

Trump never did peacefully cede power to Biden in January.

Republicans, who are you? If you’re about religious freedom, I wish you would practice that.

Conservative Christianity is not the only religion in this country, and that’s the rub, isn’t it? There’s a reason Jesus kept his nose out of government and politics. He had a much bigger stage to stand on.

I wish evangelical Christians understood that. The Republican Party is not our Savior. The Church is, actually – when Church is done right.

Neither Democrats nor Republicans have all the answers. We are all sinners. Let’s work together to figure out public policy.

I tried to read the 2020 Republican Party Platform, but it’s full of statements like this, on “Freeing Financial Markets:”

Unfortunately, in response to the financial institutions crisis of 2008-2009, the Democratic-controlled Congress enacted the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, otherwise known as Dodd-Frank. They did not let the crisis go to waste but used it as an excuse to establish unprecedented government control over the nation’s financial markets. The consequences have been bad for everyone except federal regulators.

Democrats did what they did for a reason. If the GOP disagrees, offer a response, and then gather in the same room and work it out. Name-calling solves nothing. Learn how to get along with each other and actually get it done.

Republicans, I’m tired of your glitz, arrogance and false religiosity, locally, statewide and nationally. Grow up.

That’s how you will make America great again.

Can we at least talk about it?

Believe whatever you want to.

Tell me why. Defend your beliefs and viewpoints in a plausible way.

That’s one of the greatest life lessons I’ve ever learned. That advice was given to me in the early 1980s by my first boss at a newspaper.

Mr. Maurer – everyone called him Mr. out of respect – was well into his 80s by then. He began his journalism teaching career at the University of Michigan in 1924, and chaired the U-M journalism department from 1949 until his retirement in 1966.

Along the way, he bought the Mackinac Island (Mich.) Town Crier in 1957 and staffed it with U-M students learning the business. In 1975, Mr. Maurer purchased the St. Ignace News and the Les Cheneaux Islands Weekly Wave, which later merged with the News.

That’s where I met him – as a fresh-out-of-college reporter at the Weekly Wave in Cedarville, Mich., in 1982.

Always the professor, Mr. Maurer gave me a three-year paid internship. At least, that’s the way I look back on my time there. I was working in the real world and, at the same time, learning in the classroom of Mr. Maurer’s office.

Mr. Maurer, a member of the Michigan Journalism Hall of Fame, organized Michigan’s first teachers’ union, the Michigan Federation of Teachers, and served as its president in 1936-37. He also formed the Ann Arbor Citizens Council, was active in the Wesleyan Foundation and served on the national committee of the American Civil Liberties Union.

He was still running the Mackinac Island and St. Ignace newspapers when he died in 1995 at age 98.

Mr. Maurer had many Bibles on his bookshelves. He was not a Jesus follower, but he respected my values – and challenged me to defend them in a convincing way.

Cancel culture not new

This mindset is gone in the cancel culture society of 2021.

Cancel culture has been around for a long time. We tend to interpret history to fit our views, canceling the truth. Prayer in public schools, for example, was never banned. What the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly struck down are state-sponsored or state-organized prayers in public schools. Individual or voluntary student-led prayers are, and always have been, allowed.

Cancel culture is a pejorative expression describing the use of boycotts and public shaming to hold people accountable for offensive words or actions … The expression is typically used with negative connotations in debates on free speech and censorship.

Crushing free speech by censoring viewpoints is the opposite of what Mr. Maurer stood for. In today’s cancel culture, we no longer discuss issues – because we no longer know what we believe in. Or we think we are right and everyone else is wrong.

The whole truth …

We use the Bible to judge those who support abortion. The Bible says more than “Thou shalt not kill.” The entire point of the Bible is redemption and restoration. We either don’t know that or conveniently overlook it, instead condemning people who don’t think or act like we think they should.

Is the Cleveland Indians name offensive? To whom?

The word “Indians” is neutral, neither praiseworthy nor derogatory. It is what it is, but that’s no longer good enough.

The Central Michigan University Chippewas and Florida State University Seminoles have received support from Indian tribes to keep their nicknames. Cancel culture is not as widespread as it’s made out to be.

The latest “victims” of cancel culture are several Dr. Seuss children’s books and Mr. Potato Head, whose name will remain “Mr.” after all.

And I’ve seen a few Facebook memes saying that history should not be rewritten – ie, canceled – to suit today’s culture.

Can we at least talk about it?

History is written by people with the power of the pen and with the means to publish. Who tells the story of those not so endowed? More to the point, who has the courage to listen to society’s forgotten people and report their stories – from their point of view?

Let’s face it. American history was written by wealthy white people, mostly men. Blacks and other minorities are either left out or portrayed in a negative light, generally speaking.

Can we at least talk about it?

And to think that cancel culture has a chance …

That’s one of the greatest lessons I learned in 2020. This week begins the trial of Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis police officer charged with killing George Floyd. That case sparked outrage and claims of systemic racism, which many Blacks claim remains pervasive today.

Can we at least talk about it?

Last year, we did. Often peacefully.

Systemic racism remains, and all Americans, whites and minorities alike, have roles to play in ending it. One or two people at a time.

By talking about it and listening to each other.

Not by cancel culture.

Cancel culture leads to blaming, shaming and censorship. As a Christian and as a journalist – both roles which I claim to follow and support – I say that cancel culture provides no solutions at all, only anger, bitterness and hatred.

The most famous book on that cancel list is “And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street,” which explores the difference between how kids perceive the world and how adults do.

I’ve seen reviews that claim these six books (but not Theodor Geisel’s most popular Dr. Seuss books) have racist overtones.

Geisel’s stepdaughter, Lark Grey Dimond-Cates, told the New York Post there “wasn’t a racist bone in that man’s body,” but also said suspending publication of the six titles was “a wise decision.” But the controversy left many perplexed, since the decision was made by Dr. Seuss Enterprises and not as a result of public pressure that has preceded other such decisions.

According to one review,

In the end, Marco’s dad ends up repressing his childlike imagination and joy. Instead of allowing his flights of fancy and nurturing his creativity, his father forces him to conform to the same, old boring world that everyone else lives in.

Seuss is obviously Team Kids all the way and shows in this book that it’s dangerous when adults try to repress the wild and valuable imaginations that kids have. Instead of sharing in the wonder that kids experience, adults try to stop them from enjoying things and force super boring realities on them instead. What a drag.

In the end, poor Marco concedes to his dad’s idea of reality and he gets embarrassed when he tells him what he actually saw:

“Nothing,” I said, growing red as a beet,
“But a plain horse and wagon on Mulberry Street.” (121-122)

Marco’s dad has managed to make him feel embarrassed about sharing his stories with him, but that doesn’t mean he’s won. After all, Marco’s still got that imagination on him.

Is that worth canceling?

Let’s talk about it.

Indeed, it appears the story itself is about cancel culture – and how it won’t work. The child in the story keeps his imagination, even if his father won’t allow it.

Good for him.

Why our politics and faith divide us

I haven’t written a blog in a month, because this nation has become deeply divided leading up to the Nov. 3 election and nothing much I could say would change anything. But there is a bigger picture, if anyone cares.

We should care. We have to care. Or we might perish as a nation.

The intentional political divide

The two major political parties not only compete with each other, they conspire with each other – that’s right – to keep everyone else out. Especially third parties and independents.

The parties have re-written the rules of Washington to keep their political machines operating at full speed. To do that, they intentionally keep us angry at each other, so that we remain fully engaged politically. To do that, they intentionally do NOT solve problems – because then partisan voters would lose their passion for political issues.

This keeps the extremists on both sides in power. Anger pays in politics.

I discovered these conclusions in a Harvard Business School report a friend of mine sent to me recently.

Neither party, for example, has strong

competitive incentives to solve the problem of immigration,

because a comprehensive compromise solution would

disappoint some of both parties’ most fervent supporters

and reliable donors. Additionally, once an issue is “solved,”

voters focused on that particular issue may become less

motivated to affiliate with and support the party.

Why Competition in the Politics Industry is Failing America

The report, published in September 2017, says the parties target partisan primary voters, special interests and donors. Those are the folks who influence elections. For various reasons, such as gerrymandered districts – where politicians choose their voters, not allowing voters to choose their politicians, the report says – general elections don’t have nearly the influence on government than the primaries do.

Some 70 percent of Americans fall into two other categories – average voters and non-voters. The political parties don’t spend a lot of time pursuing these Americans. When they do pursue the majority, they offer no solutions – but just demonize the other side, even calling themselves the lesser of two evils or the preferable party.

Neither side offers answers that might energize most of us, because they don’t have to. Washington is not set up to serve the public interest. Its purpose is to serve “the political industrial complex,” the report says, and Washington does that very well.

One suggestion the report offers is to seek ways to include third parties and independents in the political process. For example, only the Democratic and Republican candidates are considered for presidential debates. No independent or third-party candidate, even if such a person would offer moderate views that a significant percentage of Americans might support, has any chance at standing behind a podium before the cameras.

This is just one example of how the Dems and the GOP hate each other, but join forces to keep all other voices out.

Good vs. evil – not

To take the political divide a step further, many Americans see our two choices – Democratic or Republican – as choices between good and evil. Both parties encourage this discussion, because it energizes the base and demonizes the other side. God is on my side, and you are taking the side of evil if you oppose me.

But is this really true?

The Holland (Mich.) Sentinel posted an article on Oct. 18 describing the painful process a local pastor went through before he resigned from his congregation – over presidential politics.

“There’s a quote from Martin Luther King where he said, ‘The church must be reminded that it is not the master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state.’ That just hit me hard because I think, broadly, the white evangelical community in our country has abandoned that role.

“The question of the church largely and how it’s functioned in this moment has been really disturbing. That’s been troubling enough that I need to lay it all down.”

Keith Mannes, former pastor of East Saugatuck Christian Reformed Church

The newspaper quotes George Lundskow, a sociology professor at Grand Valley State University in Allendale, Mich., as saying the divide between conservative and progressive Christians based on their view of God is a point of division within the faith in terms of political support.

The professor explained that those who see God as punitive tend to support President Donald Trump, saying they see him as strong-willed for the way he attacks opponents and “punishes” people for being poor. Lundskow added that Christians who view God as loving and forgiving tend to be more liberal and progressive, welcoming immigrants and “seeking social justice” for the poor.

The divide in this country, then, is not only between Republicans and Democrats, but between “conservative” Christians and “liberal” Christians – both claiming the moral high ground.

Differing views of history

How did this happen?

Phil Vischer, of all people – creator of the Veggie Tales series of children’s Bible stories through the eyes of a tomato, cucumber and other personified characters – made a 15-minute video that describes the history of the Republican and Democratic parties.

Vischer describes how Blacks early in this country voted Republican, and how several events in the 1800s disenfranchised Blacks, who did not become staunch Democrats in huge numbers until the 1970s.

Vischer says that in 2016, 81 percent of White evangelical Christians voted for Trump, while 96 percent of Black Protestant Christians voted for Hillary Clinton.

All of us read the same Bible and worship the same God. How can our politics be so vastly different?

Vischer’s conclusion: It’s how we perceive the past. White Christians recall a simpler time when everyone went to church, abortion was illegal, children prayed in school and gender roles were clear. “Conservative” by definition means conserving the past.

But Black Christians view history very differently. Looking back, they see lynchings, church bombings, and politicians like Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who served in the Senate from 1954 to 2003, supporting segregation and “seeing White Christians applauding Strom Thurmond for saying that, and then re-electing him to the Senate for five decades, until he died in office in 2003.” Liberal, or “progressive,” by definition means looking forward, or change.

Vischer then says Whites generally see sin as an individual problem, with one person wronging another, while Blacks “also see sin as a systemic problem,” requiring broader solutions and broader confession and repentance.

A difference of good and evil? Not at all. Just different ways of seeing life.

If we can understand our true differences, then possibly we can work together to come up with some real solutions.

The compassion we’ve lost

The hands of compassionate women

have boiled their own children;

they become their food

in the destruction of my people.

Lamentations 4:10

 

Where has compassion gone?

As our country divides over three unforgettable issues (COVID-19, racism and a presidential election) in 2020, we have lost our heart. We are destroying ourselves from the inside out.

Right and wrong are irrelevant. We have lost the ability to convince others of our values.

I’ll say it again: Right and wrong are irrelevant.

Without compassion, all of us are wrong.

Compassion, according to the Webster’s dictionary on my bookshelf, is sympathetic consciousness of others’ distress together with a desire to alleviate it.

Instead, we ignore the distress of others. We not only have no desire to alleviate it, we add to it.

How do we regain compassion – a desire to alleviate distress in other people – in our once-great nation?

COVID-19

We’ve drawn battle lines over wearing a mask. It’s become a political “freedom” issue, not the public health issue that it truly is.

A good friend inhaled a toxic gas while serving in the Army a number of years ago, ruining his lungs. He does not wear a mask because he couldn’t breathe if he did. But he also does not pick fights with businesses that require a mask to enter.

Why is compassion so difficult? People are dying, people are getting sick. It’s a highly contagious disease. Do we want huge numbers before we acknowledge its seriousness? Whatever happened to prevention?

Countries where COVID-19 is no longer a serious threat locked themselves down for eight to 10 weeks, with nearly everyone wearing a mask and social distancing. Countries where residents think of other people – that’s compassion – bit the bullet for a time. Then, as cases waned, those countries gradually and safely opened up.

The United States is a country with 330 million individuals who aren’t willing to do that, even for a short time. Some of us did this spring, but not enough to make it work. As a result, we won’t view much college football on Saturdays this fall, and our education system is a mess trying to figure out how to begin in the next month.

There are consequences for our actions, or lack thereof.

But let’s not get tyrannical about it. If a store requires a mask to enter and you won’t wear one, respect the store’s policy. If you wear a mask and you see others not wearing one, keep your distance. Let’s not scream at each other. That solves nothing.

Racism

When George Floyd was killed this spring in Minneapolis, a firestorm of protest ignited, figuratively and literally. There are extremists on both sides, and often those are the voices we hear.

metro health

Instead, can we learn compassion for each other?

This is a hard one, because the history of racism is long and deep. It’s ingrained. I’m sorry to say that, but it is.

We whites flippantly say, well, slavery ended soon after the Civil War, so get over it. Legally, maybe, but our hearts did not change, and still haven’t in many of us.

Compassion is sympathetic consciousness of others’ distress together with a desire to alleviate it. This starts with listening to each other, to your story and mine. Without anger. Without prejudice. Without judgment.

On both sides.

Do you have friends of other races and ethnicities? Can you work together on the job, and take instruction from each other? Be honest.

If not, do the rest of us a favor and keep silent (including on social media). If you do, let’s show compassion for each other in our leisure activities and our work spaces.

In the words of a song I learned as a child, “Let there be peace on Earth, and let it begin with me.”

Presidential election

­Neither side has the full truth.

Democrats are not anti-life. Republicans are not narrow-minded Bible thumpers.

While Democrats support abortion as an option to end life, they do much better than Republicans do in the public arena should that baby be born. Dems know that all of us have immigrant backgrounds, some more recent than others. Guns in rural areas are used for sport or for hunting deer and other animals, generally. Guns in cities are used to kill other people (unless you’re into skeet shooting, or something similar). There are problems with mail-in voting, sure. So, fix them. Don’t throw out the whole system, or ruin the U.S. Postal Service over it.

Black lives do matter. Again, both sides have extremists on this issue. Let’s learn how to share leadership (a huge issue for white people) with respect, not resentment, on all sides.

With compassion.

Scripture clearly opposes same-sex marriage, but be careful how you apply that. Jesus talked with a Samaritan woman at a well who had five husbands and was living with a sixth man. In another scene, Jesus was introduced to a woman caught in adultery. Did he cast the first stone? He did not.

Do these stories mean Jesus supports divorce and adultery?

No. Jesus cares about people, since all of us have issues. By meeting our deepest needs, Jesus helps us understand the difference between right and wrong.

Jesus showed compassion in the face of sin. He told the woman caught in adultery, “Neither do I condemn you. Go your way, and from now on do not sin again.” (John 8:11)

That’s compassion.

Where is that standard of righteousness, with forgiveness and empathy, today?

I’ve seen people bash the ethics of either President Trump or his Democratic challenger, Joe Biden. We’ve been finding fault with our leaders for generations. I’ve often wondered why anyone would even want that job.

Where is empathy?

Compassion has not been a strong suit of Americans for a long time.

Except, perhaps, on the athletic field.

When a player suffers a serious injury during a game, it’s not unusual to see athletes from both teams gather together, kneel and say a prayer for healing. When the athlete is placed on a stretcher and taken off the field, the fans in the stands – whether the player is wearing a home or visitor’s uniform – clap as a sign of respect.

It often takes a tragedy to draw us together.

Sept. 11, 2001, united us as a nation against a common enemy.

COVID-19 should have brought us together in a similar way against a common enemy, even though a coronavirus is unseen. But at some point in recent years, we lost the desire to fight for each other.

When four police officers killed George Floyd, we stopped for a moment and listened. Some of us did, anyway. But we as a nation won’t acknowledge racism as a common enemy, so that’s not a fight we’re prepared to win at the moment. (Respect goes both ways. There are deep, deep issues here.)

And the presidential election has turned into an ugly social media battle.

We must get beyond tweets and memes. We must listen to each other’s distress, then seek to alleviate it. If I do that for you and you do that for me …

We will be showing compassion for each other. And we will be a United States of America again.

Hope rising from the pain

Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow. If you sow to your own flesh, you will reap corruption from the flesh; but if you sow to the Spirit, you will reap eternal life from the Spirit.

Galatians 6:7-8

 

If we sow violence, we reap violence. If we sow finger-pointing, we reap finger-pointing. If we sow anger, that’s what we reap. If we sow peace, we receive peace (in the Spirit, if not in practice).

We don’t get this. If we raise a Bible outside (or inside) a church, we think God is automatically on our side. If we defend every lifestyle under the sun, we think that defines love.

If we actually opened our Bibles and tried to understand its meaning, we’d see that both sides have missed the point.

All is not lost, however. Many of us do get it.

Especially in the past week or so. As George Floyd is laid to rest, we as a nation are taking a collective breath.

Perhaps for the first time since the Civil Rights Act was passed after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968, we are learning to listen to each other. Equality, justice and mutual respect are gaining traction, but we still have a long way to go. A very long way.

We see violence on cell phone and store camera videos, but racism goes much deeper than that. An offhand comment here. A derogatory word there. A promotion not received. Educational disparities. Housing discrimination. A look in a donut shop or grocery store.

listening 5

I attended a listening event last week in my city, where I heard about two dozen people share stories, many stories, including young people facing racism from peers, teachers and administrators at school; parents who did not receive justice in the courthouse next door; people who suffered silently from random events around town …

I’ve heard stories from friends with a different skin color than mine, people who are successful in life, people full of caring hearts and kind words. Even they have stories. I had no idea.

Recent stories. Current stories.

We have such a long way to go.

We focus on institutional changes, and those need to happen. Accountability in our police departments. Changes to our educational systems. Prosecution of looters and vandals – and how to prevent those people from showing up at future demonstrations and riots. Hires and promotions earned regardless of skin color.

These are big-picture, long-term issues that our nation must address.

We reap what we sow.

And yet … we cannot legislate morality. Changing laws will do only so much.

 

From now on, therefore, we regard no one from a human point of view; even though we once knew Christ from a human point of view, we know him no longer in that way. So if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation; everything old has passed away, see, everything has become new!

2 Corinthians 5:16-17

 

Even more than new (or better) laws, we need new (or better) hearts.

The human point of view is selfish, me first, I’m right and know what’s best. This goes all the way back to Adam and Eve. Every human, man and woman, who has ever lived understands this. Myself included. Every time I run a red (or pink) light I’m saying that my values and purpose are more important than society’s values, that the light has to turn green for someone else and I have to stop and wait while other drivers pass through the intersection.

I roll my eyes, get impatient. Especially when traffic clears and the light stays red.

Selfishness is that easy. I need a heart change.

Time to breathe.

Society does not revolve around me. I have to keep reminding myself of that, and still I don’t learn.

We wave the Bible in public, making a mockery of God’s written word because we won’t open the pages and actually read what’s inside it.

Those who condemn our president’s recent Bible-toting photo op in front of a Washington, D.C., church often aren’t modeling Christian values either.

There’s plenty of anger and finger-pointing on both sides. The anger and, yes, hatred on both sides have simmered for years; George Floyd’s horrific death was the lightning rod that triggered our hearts to act on our anger.

Righteous anger? Yes, far too often.

As a white man, it’s not up to me to analyze what’s going on and decide how to fix it.

White men have run this country since it was formed. Let’s be honest. In all other societies throughout history, the only way a minority group takes power is by force – figuring out how to overthrow the ruling oppressors.

We in the United States are working to share leadership, power and authority. It’s not natural, and it’s certainly not coming easily.

It requires a heart change. We can’t legislate morality. We can write in the preamble to the Declaration of Independence that “All men are created equal …” but until we actually treat each other that way, such statements are nothing more than pipe dreams.

This requires humility. The willingness to listen. To let others lead. To respect opinions and decisions different than ours.

None of that happens without a heart change.

I am encouraged. In the midst of police brutality and destruction of small businesses despite our not-quite-over-yet isolation from COVID-19, I see many people listening. I see police chiefs and officers marching with protesters, not against them. I see many people helping clean up broken windows and stores. I see blacks, whites, Asians and others talking, listening, meeting together, seeking to find similarities instead of differences.

In the midst of struggle and pain, I see hope.

We have such a long way to go.

But we have to start somewhere.

Will history look back at this moment as a turning point in our country?

This is my prayer.  Let’s make it happen.

We’ve learned the wrong lesson from 9/11

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

So said George Santayana, a Spanish-born American author, in 1905.

Perhaps that’s why my wife and I, during a long weekend in New York for a wedding, took a train and subway ride into the Big Apple to see the 9/11 memorial.

As a friend told us, that’s something you do only once. It’s a sober reminder of what happened on one particular day 18 years ago.

Once is enough for a powerful reminder like that.

Cannot forget

If you were old enough to remember that day, those two airplanes crashing into the iconic World Trade Center towers provided memories you’ll never forget. I was a newspaper copy editor in Michigan at the time, watching the surreal events unfold on deadline.

newspapers 7

Our daily newspaper published several editions that day, because the news happened so fast. Our first edition didn’t even mention the attack. The last edition – literally a stop-the-presses moment – reported the panic and shock of a nation-defining tragedy.

Since that day, our society has changed permanently, and not necessarily for the better. We no longer trust each other, not in airports – security is tighter than it’s ever been – or even on the sidewalk, where we stare at our phones or listen to our music, oblivious to the world around us.

Burned-out fire trucks and ambulances. Twisted steel of the north and south towers. Charred pieces of the airplanes-turned-weapons. Snippets from the morning TV talk shows, interrupted by updates from Ground Zero. Smoke billowing in New York, at the Pentagon and in western Pennsylvania.

memorial 9

The memorial captures all of it. And much more.

As if we could ever forget.

Fear replaces trust

It struck me that people in other parts of the world face these fears every day. Imagine the Kurds in Syria right now. Will they be alive tomorrow?

We lived through that once.

Just once.

We have the capability to prevent such attacks, for the most part anyway, by stepping up security. Cameras watch us everywhere – not just at airports, but at businesses, street corners and even some private homes.

We don’t trust anyone anymore.

Why is there so much evil in the world today? Because that’s what we expect of each other.

We act out our fears.

If, instead, we would look for the good in the world, we’d see it. I discovered that as we raised our three sons. Give them a little age-appropriate responsibility, and they’ll step up. A little alone time because Mom and Dad both need to run a short errand. Then, our oldest driving to an out-of-town event with his best friend as a teenager. Eventually, all three of our sons went away to college.

We trusted them, because we’d prepared them. And they passed with flying colors.

Perhaps that works at home, but society no longer operates that way.

Unity, for a brief moment

If your skin color is different, if your nationality or religious beliefs are different, you are not to be trusted. That didn’t start on Sept. 11, 2001, of course, but it sure increased after that date.

Immediately after 9/11, this nation unified like I’d never seen it do before. That lasted about three weeks. Then people stopped going to church and praying for each other, seeking solace in the unity that comes from a shared experience.

memorial 8

In a sense, we’ve forgotten the past already. We’ve forgotten what unifies us.

We care only about what divides us. Our politics, our religion, our nationality, our social values, our language. We build walls, literal ones and figurative ones in our hearts.

Every one of us, including me, does this.

When our sons were learning to drive, I told them not to trust any other driver on the road. Act as if all of them are idiots, so that when another driver does something stupid, you won’t be surprised. And you’ll be ready to react.

That’s good advice on the road. Unfortunately, we live all of our lives that way, don’t we?

We prove ourselves untrustworthy. Every time I drive on a highway – every single time – I get passed by drivers going 15 mph or more over the speed limit. So do you, unless you’re the speeder. There aren’t enough police cars out there to prevent this.

Identity theft. Robo calls. Inferior products (we don’t build things the way we used to; I could write a column just about this). I’m renting a tux for an upcoming wedding; the company doesn’t want me to pick it up early, and they want it back on Sunday, the day after the wedding. They don’t trust me to keep it even one extra day, even though I’m paying more than $200 for the privilege of holding onto that tux for, like, four days. Not five.

The new normal

Why do we remember 9/11? Is it to point fingers at the bad guys?

Is that all we learned?

Have we forgotten what unifies us?

memorial 23

Every one of us is the bad guy, actually. Each of us, including you and me, is an enemy to someone. If you call yourself a Republican or a Democrat, you’re an enemy. If you’re white or black or Middle Eastern, you’re an enemy to someone. If you’re a Christian or a Muslim, you’re Satan personified to someone.

We have more in common than we think we do. 9/11 proved that, if only for three weeks.

The fallout proves how much we’ve forgotten.

Why visit the 9/11 memorial in New York?

How do we prevent such a tragedy from happening again? While we haven’t had an attack of that scale on our soil since, we have mass shootings all the time. Most of them are internal, not from outside terrorists.

memorial 27

We no longer trust each other. We put up walls and stockpile weapons to protect ourselves. The spiral deepens.

I went for a jog through the neighborhood shortly after we bought our house two years ago. I left the front door open, since I wasn’t planning to be gone long. My neighbor noticed and said I shouldn’t do that, because there’s teenagers around who will steal stuff.

Even in suburban America, this is the world we live in. We’re hardly safe even in our own homes.

The world has come to our front porch. We’ve slammed the door, and locked it out.

This is our 9/11 legacy. I’m afraid we’ve missed the lesson we needed to learn.

The prominent, the unknowns and the evil ones …

The New Testament begins with, of all things, a genealogy. Matthew, a former tax collector and one of Jesus’ 12 apostles, wrote his Gospel letter to a Jewish audience, to prove that Jesus was the long-awaited Messiah.

In that vein, he began his genealogy with Abraham – who the Jews considered their father – and included David, since the Messiah was to come through David’s line.

As with any group of people, some of Jesus’ descendants were prominent, such as Isaac, Jacob, Solomon, Jehoshaphat and Josiah. Some are unknowns. (Even among Jesus’ 12 apostles, we know quite a bit about a few of them, and not much about most of them.)

A few in this list were downright evil, including Joram (Jehoram), Ahaz and Amon. Yet they were ancestors of the savior of the world.

Each of these men had a purpose. I used a resource on my bookshelf, “Everyone in the Bible” by William P. Barker, copyright 1966 (history doesn’t change), to bring this genealogical list to life.

 

Abraham: The patriarch who was the father of the people of God … Promised a land and descendants, Abraham lived most of his life without either, having to live on trust. God entered into a covenant with Abraham, assuring him that He kept His word. Finally, in his old age, a son called Isaac was born to Abraham and his wife, Sarah. Abraham’s supreme test of faith came when God … ordered Abraham to sacrifice the boy. Abraham obediently prepared to carry out the orders, but was stayed at the last minute when God intervened … Appropriately, his name in Hebrew means “father of a multitude,” and he is revered as the spiritual ancestor of all Jews and Christians. Genesis 11-25

Isaac: Isaac accepted Rebekah as his wife after a trusted family servant brought her from Abraham’s home country to be his bride, and became the father of the twins, Esau and Jacob … Isaac became wealthy during his sojourn with the Philistines, and they became jealous … Isaac, in his old age, blind and feeble, was tricked by Jacob into bestowing his final blessing on Jacob, the younger son, instead of Esau, the older and Isaac’s favorite. Genesis 17-35

Jacob: Jacob – known later as Israel – was the father of the 12 sons whose families became known as the tribes of Israel. Jacob’s name means “supplanter,” and literally from his birth onward he tried to supplant his older brother, Esau … Esau, of course, was furious at his scheming brother, and Jacob fled for his life. During his flight, at Bethel one night, Jacob experienced the vision of God’s angels descending on steps to him – his first awareness of God’s plans for him … Jacob, with the many members of his family and his large flocks, journeyed toward Palestine. Jacob, however, remembered his past injustices to Esau and worried about the reception Esau would give him. After dividing his following into two forces, so that one at least might escape if Esau attacked, Jacob found himself alone. That night he dreamed that he wrestled with an angel … Shortly after, Jacob met his brother Esau, and was relieved to find that Esau held no grudge. Jacob then settled down to the quiet life of a family patriarch. Genesis 25, 27-37, 42, 45-50

Judah: Jacob’s fourth son, Judah was the progenitor of the tribe known by his name. He was involved with his brothers in selling Joseph into slavery … In Egypt, Judah pleaded that Joseph release their youngest brother, Benjamin, even offering to take Benjamin’s place, when Joseph pretended to frame his brothers with charges of non-payment for grain. Judah later received the privileges of the oldest son after his older brothers, Reuben, Simeon and Levi, disgraced themselves. Genesis 29, 35, 37 38, 43, 44, 46, 49

Perez: Judah’s older twin son through his incestuous relations with Tamar, his daughter-in-law, Perez was an ancient clan chieftain in the powerful tribe of Judah … Nothing of his life, however, is known beyond his parentage. Genesis 38:29, 46:12

Hezron: Hezron was a grandson of Judah and a son of Perez, and, according to the genealogies of both Matthew and Luke, an ancestor of Jesus. Genesis 46:12

Aram (Ram): He is mainly remembered because he was an ancestor of both David and Jesus. Ruth 4:19

Amminadab: A member of the tribe of Levi, Amminadab was the father of Elisheba, Aaron’s wife. Exodus 6:23 Perhaps the same (person, this) Amminadab was an ancestor of David, according to Ruth’s genealogy. Ruth 4:19-20

Nahshon: Aaron’s brother-in-law and a descendant of Judah, Nahshon was a “prince” of Judah who was an ancestor of David and of Jesus. He was also known as Naashon, Naasson and Naason. Exodus 6:23, Numbers 1:7, 2:3, 7:12, 17, 10:14

Salmon: A descendant of Caleb … he was the reputed founder of the town of Bethlehem. Although there seems to be some confusion in the accounts between Salmon and Salma, careful study seems to indicate that they were the same person: the husband of Rahab, the father of Boaz who later married Ruth, and the ancestor of both David and Jesus. Ruth 4:20, 21

Boaz: A well-to-do landowner of the tribe of Judah near Bethlehem, Boaz took pity on a young Moabite widow named Ruth who was working in his fields. The tender story of Boaz’s kindness and Ruth’s loyalty is the plot of the Book of Ruth. Ruth

Obed: Ruth’s mother-in-law by her first marriage, Naomi, looked after the young Obed. Obed was fondly remembered as the father of Jesse, David’s father, and an ancestor of Jesus. Ruth 4

books1

Jesse: Jesse is best remembered as the father of the great King David. He was a prominent man, perhaps the leader, at Bethlehem, and the father of eight sons. During David’s outlaw days, Jesse and his wife were sent to relatives at Moab for safety. He was undoubtedly elderly by that time, and probably did not live to see his youngest son crowned as king of the united monarchy. Although in David’s day the term “son of Jesse” was spoken with a sneer, to call attention to David’s humble origins, in time it came to be used as a synonym for the expected Messiah. Ruth 4:17, 22; 1 Samuel 16, 17, 20, 22, 25

David: Israel’s most famous king, David was considered to be the ideal ruler and the prototype for the promised Messiah, in Jewish thinking … Sent to soothe the emotionally ill King Saul with his music, David rapidly advanced in Saul’s court until his popularity made Saul insanely jealous. David fled for his life, and became leader of a band of outlaws. After Saul’s death on Mount Gilboa, David returned home, was made the king of Hebron and waged a long but successful war against the Philistines … David made Jerusalem the religious center of the new nation by bringing the Ark of the Covenant into the capital … He extended the nation’s borders in all directions, and brought prosperity and prominence to his people. His later years were marred by a sordid affair with Bathsheba … Incest, murder, rebellion and plots within David’s own household turned his final days into ones of deep trial … Nevertheless, David’s deep trust in God, his sense of justice, and his personal attractiveness were apparent until nearly the end of his life. The nation fondly remembered his reign as its golden age. 1 and 2 Samuel

 

Solomon: David’s 10th son and his successor to the throne, Solomon came to power principally because of the intrigues of his mother, Bathsheba, during David’s senility … He introduced the system of forced labor gangs to furnish manpower for his ambitious building programs, and broke down the old system of tribal rule with his well-organized administrative districts … The great Temple was but one of his ambitious building projects. To finance all this opulence, Solomon taxed his subjects so oppressively that the nation simmered with revolt during his last days. Although his wisdom and piety were extolled by some Biblical writers, Solomon was a shrewd, overbearing, worldly, comfort-loving dictator. 1 Kings 1-14

Rehoboam: The stubborn, arrogant son of Solomon, Rehoboam succeeded Solomon as king of the nation in 937 B.C. … Rehoboam insisted on continuing Solomon’s policies. The northern tribes, never welded to the united kingdom, promptly seceded. Rehoboam, forced to retire in humiliation to Jerusalem, wanted to march against the 10 rebellious tribes, but was prevented by the prophet Shemaiah’s warnings and by Shishak of Egypt’s invasion. 1 Kings 11-12, 14-15

Abijah: Great-grandson of David, Abijah was the favorite son of Rehoboam. He ruled Judah for about two years at a time when Jeroboam had been king of the northern kingdom, Israel, for about 20 years. The Book of Kings states that Abijah continued all the sins of his ancestors. Chronicles, however, portrays him as a defender of the faith whose moment of glory came when he defeated Jeroboam’s larger army and captured three Israelite cities and great booty. 2 Chronicles 11-14, 1 Kings 14, 15

Asa: The king of Judah from about 918-877 B.C., Asa was one of the few rulers who tried to bring about some social and religious reforms. He was also an energetic builder, astute statesman and competent military leader. During most of his long reign, Judah enjoyed a breathing spell of prosperity, peace and morality. In his old age, however, Asa showed a lack of trust in the Lord by buying protection from the Syrian king, Ben-hadad, when Baasha, king of Israel, mobilized against Judah … Not long after, he contracted a painful foot disease, regarded as punishment for his failure to trust. 1 Kings 15-16, 22:41-46

Jehoshaphat: The king of Judah who was the son and successor of Asa, Jehoshaphat tried to be a model of piety and a guardian of the faith by sending teachers of the Law throughout the kingdom and closing down Baal shrines. Probably his biggest contribution was to stop the long-running feud between Judah and the northern kingdom of Israel. However, when Jehoshaphat married his son to Athaliah, daughter of Israel’s notorious Jezebel and Ahab, he unwittingly brought trouble … His 25-year reign was considered a high point in Judah’s history. 2 Chronicles 17-22

Joram (Jehoram): The son and successor of King Jehoshaphat of Judah. To seal an alliance between his father and Ahab, king of Israel, Jehoram was given the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel, Athaliah, as his bride. Athaliah dominated her husband, persuading him to reintroduce and encourage Baal worship in Judah. Jehoram even stooped to murdering his six brothers when he was crowned king. During his sorry reign, Libnah and Edom broke away from Judah. He was so loathed by his subjects that when he died they refused him burial in the royal tombs. 2 Chronicles 21:1-16, 22:1-11

Uzziah: Amaziah’s son and successor as king of Judah, Uzziah became king at the age of 16 and ruled 52 years. During his long reign, he successfully defended Judah against the belligerent Ammonites, Philistines and Arabians, developed a strong standing army, and rebuilt the nation’s fortifications … In spite of the continuation of cults, contemporary historians gave Uzziah high marks for his religious devotion. He was so crippled with leprosy toward the end of his reign that he was forced to turn over the government to his son, Jotham. 2 Kings 15, 2 Chronicles 26

Jotham: A contemporary of the prophets Hosea, Isaiah and Micah, Jotham ruled as de facto king during the last years of King Uzziah’s life, when Uzziah was ill. After the death of his illustrious father Uzziah, Jotham succeeded to the throne of Judah and proved to be an able administrator. He subdued the Ammonites, built the upper gate of the Temple, and was highly regarded by Hebrew historians. 2 Kings 15

Ahaz: Eleventh king of Judah, Ahaz was Jotham’s son and Hezekiah’s father. His 16-year reign (about 735 B.C. to about 720 B.C.) was the backdrop for the prophet Isaiah’s great career. Ahaz preferred to play international politics rather than heed Isaiah’s sound advice … Inevitably, Ahaz and Judah came out as losers, paying expensive “presents” to larger powers. A superstitious dabbler in idolatrous cults, Ahaz left his country weakened morally and financially. 2 Kings 15-17

Hezekiah: The famous reform-minded king of Judah, Hezekiah … successfully led his country through the frightening days when Assyria was sweeping over the world in the eighth century B.C. … Hezekiah heeded the prophet Isaiah’s advice and stood fast. The Assyrian King Sennacherib’s siege of Jerusalem suddenly and miraculously ended when a plague decimated the Assyrian army. Even today, visitors to Jerusalem can see Hezekiah’s tunnel, the conduit through rock which brought water into the city during the siege – one of many projects initiated by the energetic king. After the glorious deliverance from the siege, Hezekiah launched a long-needed reform of morals and religion in the nation. 2 Kings 16, 18-21

Manasseh: The son and successor of King Hezekiah of Judah, Manasseh became king at age 12, upon his father’s death. An anti-reform group used the boy to stop the reforms in worship and morals begun by Hezekiah. For many years, Manasseh outdid himself to accommodate cults and please their adherents. He even practiced human sacrifice, using his own son. The prophets attributed the fall of Jerusalem to the cruelty and superstition that was allowed to flourish during most of Manasseh’s 55-year reign … According to the Chronicler, Manasseh was taken prisoner briefly by the Assyrians in his later years, finally realized his disobedience to God, and was allowed by God to return to Jerusalem, where he mended his ways before he died. 2 Kings 20, 21, 23, 24, 2 Chronicles 33:1-23

Amon: The king of Judah who succeeded Manasseh, Amon reigned two years in a dreary repeat of his father Manasseh’s immorality, luxury and corruption. He was assassinated in a palace intrigue (639 B.C.), and died unmourned. 2 Kings 21

Josiah: The king of Judah whose reform staved off the collapse of the kingdom for a few years, Josiah was the son and successor of the notorious King Amon. He was crowned when he was only 8, after his father’s assassination, and began his active rule when he was 18. At the suggestion of the high priest Hilkiah, Josiah ordered the Temple repaired. During the repairs, a lost book of the Law was discovered (what we call Deuteronomy). When this was read to the King, he ordered its requirements observed, and took active steps to clean up the mess in Judah. Josiah effectively closed down the dozens of local shrines … and centralized all worship in Jerusalem … He died as boldly as he lived: When Neco, the Egyptian pharaoh, invaded northern Palestine, Josiah recklessly jumped into battle and lost his life at Megiddo. 2 Kings 16-34

Jechoniah (Jehoiachin): The son of King Jehoiakim of Judah, Jehoiachin was the last king of Judah before Nebuchadnezzar snuffed out the valiant but faithless little nation. Succeeding a father who left the kingdom in a hopeless condition, 18-year-old Jehoiachin ruled only three months … (He) was imprisoned during Nebuchadnezzar’s entire reign. He was finally released when Evil-Merodach replaced Nebuchadnezzar, and was kept under house arrest in Babylon for the rest of his life. 2 Kings 24:6-15, Jeremiah 22, 24, 28.

Salathiel (Sheatiel): A descendant of David and a son of King Jeconiah, Shealtiel was best remembered as the father of Zerubbabel. Ezra 3:2, 8.

Zerubbabel: The man who led the first group of dispirited exiles back to Jerusalem from Babylon, Zerubbabel was the governor of Jerusalem in the dismal days at the close of the Exile. Zerubbabel directed the resumption of worship, the rebuilding of the altar, and the foundation construction for the new Temple. A descendant of David, he was a member of the royal family. 1 Chronicles 3:19, Ezra 2:2, 3:2, 8, 4:2, 3, 5:2, Nehemiah 7:7, 12:1, 47.

Abiud: Mentioned in the genealogy of Jesus (and not elsewhere) as the son of Zerubbabel. https://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/abiud/

Eliakim: An ancestor of Jesus, Eliakim is included in Jesus’ family tree by both Matthew and Luke. Matthew 1:13, Luke 3:30

Azor: One of Jesus’ ancestors, Azor was listed in Matthew’s genealogy as a grandson of Zerubbabel. Matthew 1:13-14

Zadok: An important “chief of the people” after the Exile, this Zadok was one of the leaders in Jerusalem who joined Nehemiah in signing the covenant promising to keep the Law. Nehemiah 10:21

Achim: One of Joseph’s distant ancestors, Achim is mentioned only by Matthew in his genealogical table. Matthew 1:14

Eliud: One of Jesus’ ancestors, Eliud is listed in the genealogy of Joseph by Matthew. Matthew 1:14-15

Eleazar: He was listed in Jesus’ family tree by Matthew as a son of Eliud, and Joseph’s great-grandfather. Matthew 1:15

Matthan: One of Jesus’ ancestors, according to Matthew’s list, Matthan is listed as Joseph’s grandfather. He is undoubtedly the same man as “Matthat,” whom Luke names as Joseph’s grandfather. Matthew 1:15

Jacob (Heli): The father of Joseph, who was the husband of Mary the mother of Jesus, Heli was also believed to be an uncle of Mary. Luke 3:23

Joseph: The kindly carpenter of Nazareth who agreed to go ahead with wedding plans although he knew his betrothed, Mary, was to have a baby, this Joseph was Jesus’ earthly father. He was a conscientious Jew who adhered faithfully to the Law, but was considerate enough to plan to spare Mary the indignities required by the Law. When he learned the Divine origin of her unborn Child, he immediately trusted God’s promise and married Mary. After the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem and the harrowing flight to Egypt to escape Herod’s slaughter of male babies, Joseph resettled his family at Nazareth and lived the quiet life of a village builder-repairman. He was the father of several other children, but apparently died before Jesus began His active ministry. Matthew 1:16-24, Luke 2:4-43

Jesus: Born at Bethlehem during the last years of Herod the Great, Jesus, at His birth, was acclaimed God’s Chosen One by shepherds … Luke 2:8-20